The wall of propaganda is broken: how Ukraine achieved the unblocking of the Azov regiment in Meta social networks


The propaganda wall is broken: how Ukraine managed to unblock the Azov regiment on Meta social networks

For several years, Azov could not be mentioned on Instagram and Facebook, because users were immediately blocked for this. This Meta policy was based on the fabrications and lies of Russia, which promoted to the West the narrative that the military regiments were Nazis. However, at the beginning of 2023, the Ministry of Digital Development managed to finally destroy the wall of Russian propaganda – Meta lifted all the bans associated with Azov.

For Meta to finally unblock Azov in its social networks, they actively worked for several years regiment representatives. Subsequently, this issue began to be studied in the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, which is important even before the start of the Russian invasion in 2022. However, the main work began precisely after February 24, when the Azov fighters heroically held the defense of Mariupol, and social networks blocked posts for mentioning the regiment.

It took almost a year to convince Meta to remove Azov from the list of dangerous individuals and organizations. For Ukraine, this is a very important decision. For the first time in history, we were lifted from a large-scale ban that lasted for several years, which was constantly supported by Russian propaganda around the world. Now Ukrainians can safely write on Facebook and Instagram about the regiment, its military, military operations, financial collections, etc. Of course, provided that this content does not violate the Meta policy.

Unlock “Azov”on the part of the Ministry of Digital Development, Anton Melnik, an expert on innovations and start-ups, was mainly involved; on the part of the regiment, Yulia Fedosyuk, the wife of an Azov soldier, a representative of the Association of Families of Defenders of Azovstal, and Ekaterina Prokopenko is the wife of Denis Prokopenko “Radish” regiment commander. How we managed to influence Meta's decision and why the lifting of the ban on Azov is a blow to Russian propaganda – we tell in the material of the Channel 24 website.

Let's start with a short story – July 7, 2015 administration Facebook removed the official Azov page, which had more than 50,000 followers, without notice. Since then, that is, almost 8 years, there has been no other official Facebook page of the regiment. Subsequently, it turned out that the social network, in principle, bans for any mention of “Azov” or its military.

Facebook's decision was not without Russia and propaganda. It was the aggressor country that promoted to the West the opinion that Azov is a neo-Nazi group, and its fighters are radical nationalists. And this, despite the fact that Crimean Tatars, Georgians, Jews serve in the regiment, who are difficult to imagine as “Nazis.” In general, Azov people are people of different cultures, religions, who communicate in different languages. But this does not negate the fact that it was beneficial for Russia to discredit them and show them as terrorists.

When we are asked about neo-Nazism… “Azov” is a multinational unit, it is a kind of assembly point for anti-Kremlin forces, in whose ranks the same Russians and Belarusians serve, who, unable to take up arms in their own countries, came to “Azov “and he gave them such an opportunity,” says Yulia Fedosyuk.

Unfortunately, this hostile Russian theory about Azov “neo-Nazis” was also supported by some Western journalists, politicians, and activists. It got to the point that in October 2019, 40 congressmen demanded at the US State Department to add Azov to the list of foreign terrorist organizations. However, this did not happen.

Important! The Azov Regiment is a separate special forces detachment that is part of the National Guard formation. That is, this is an official state unit subordinate to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine.

In general, the Western media and organizations that accused the regiment of almost all the sins of the military world were unable to provide reasoned facts about this. Until February 24, there were a huge number of monitoring groups in Ukraine, which monitored, in particular, the regiment and its combat activities.

“There is no evidence of war crimes that would have been committed by representatives of Azov. And this is the main argument. After all, you can say whatever you like, show some photos, but there are facts. And the facts say that Azov is an effective unit, which demonstrated heroic power in Mariupol and in the war.In addition, the regiment is supported both in the East and in the West, and in the Center, and in Crimea.It is supported by the Jewish community, LGBT – these groups of the population, in my opinion, neo-Nazism and neo-Nazis will not be supported,” explains Yulia Fedosyuk.

So this whole anti-Azov campaign affected not only people, but also companies. In 2016, Facebook added Azov to the list of dangerous organizations , and started blocking any pages related to the regiment .According to non-public data, the American company even conducted its own investigation into Azov, worked it out with lawyers and supported it with photos, videos, and articles from important Western media. Therefore, it was almost impossible for users to prove to Facebook or Instagram that Azov were not terrorists or neo-Nazis.

Unfortunately, Ukraine and the government did not react to the whole round of Russian propaganda against Azov in the world. Yulia recalls that “then everyone laughed, that it was stupid, that all these materials were just a fiction of the Russians, and they moved on. And the regiment is still trying to correct the consequences of the blocking.”

Ban “Azov”, again, took place thanks to the Russians, their powerful propaganda and resources, and also thanks to the inaction of the Ukrainian government of that time. Therefore, subsequently, Azov got used to the fact that they were blocked in social networks, – says Anton Melnik. how social networks circumvented the ban

In recent years, Ukrainians, the Ukrainian media have tried to avoid mentioning Azov in social networks or wrote about them without directly naming them. But a full-scale invasion in early 2022 again exposed the problem of blocking the regiment on Facebook and Instagram. When the Azov people courageously defended the country at the front, Meta massively blocked users for mentioning them.

A vivid history began after a full-scale war. “Azov”, like other military units, has increased significantly, new people have come. Subsequently, the regiment courageously showed itself in Mariupol. Everyone once again saw that Azov is a heroic unit with the head of Radish, – says Anton Melnik.

So, was it possible to remain silent about what was happening in Mariupol or at Azovstal? No. It was necessary to speak, shout, show how the Azovites, together with other units, defend the country, in what conditions they are, how they repulse the attacks of the Russians to the last and draw their significant forces onto themselves.

Then the designations “defenders of Mariupol, Azovstal”, “a regiment under the command of Denis Prokopenko” appeared on the network. And, of course, it was necessary to ensure that photos or videos posted online did not have the Azov symbol or chevrons. It was the only way to tell the world the truth about the events in Mariupol and not get banned.

By the way, in the social networks of Channel 24, we constantly wrote about Azov since the beginning of the war in Donbass, there were hundreds of posts on Facebook and Instagram. However, like most Ukrainian media, one day they got banned for it. And then another and another. One of the bans was for a chevron that was almost invisible in the photo, although there was no mention of Azov itself anywhere.

Our story with the blocking of Azov began long before the full-scale invasion. Since 2014, we have been very active in posting publications with the regiment and its symbols, and what is most surprising is thatthe first ban was received for a publication that hung on the page all year round!That is, for a year, the Meta thought that everything was OK, and then suddenly decided to take up old publications, “says Jaromir Vdovich, head of the SMM department of Channel 24.

Of course, these bans had a negative impact on the page, the coverage dropped significantly, which means that the traffic on the site also fell.Therefore, we had to clean Facebook from any mention of Azov, deleted an incredible number of publications and hoped that we didn’t miss anything. was to speak without naming him.That was the only way.

The word and symbols of AZOV have become taboo with us. Everywhere where the regiment appeared, we wrote “regiment”, “military”, “defenders of Mariupol”. We tried to fight this for a long time, wrote to various departments of the Meta and the support service. But it didn't help at all. Fortunately, we managed to find the right people in the media community who contributed to the fact that the bans were lifted for us, adds Jaromir.

Therefore, if we, journalists, for example, somehow tried to bypass the threats of blocking on Facebook or Instagram (although this was not always possible), then the soldiers of the regiment or their relatives received bans constantly.

We understand that social networks are actually mouthpieces on a par with the media. And not being in them means again letting someone else talk about you. It is also important here that others could talk about Azov, and we were simply removed – both our point of view, and arguments, and just elementary information about what is happening in the city, which the Russians razed to the ground, – Yulia explains the problem of blocking Fedosyuk.

He also adds that due to the policy of social networks it was difficult to help the regiment – to raise funds to buy walkie-talkies, thermal imaging sights for the guys, and transfer them to Azovstal when it was possible. Each camp was canceled due to the fact that it went specifically to the “Azov” groups.

It is a mistake to think that work on unlocking “Azov” began after February 24th. No. The representatives of the regiment have been trying to bring the truth to both Meta and the world since the first blockages. The Ministry of Digital Transformation has been dealing with this problem since 2021, because they saw that people were blocked on social networks for any mention related to the regiment – for words, for memories, for photos.

However, it is logical that after the full-scale invasion, the work on unblocking Azov on Facebook and Instagram seriously intensified and became noticeable. Representatives of the regiment began to communicate directly with representatives of the Ministry of Digital Development, and those with Nick Clegg, Meta's president for global policy.

If we talk about names, Yulia Fedosyuk was mainly involved in the issue of unblocking Azov in social networks from the side of the regiment and Ekaterina Prokopenko. On the part of the Ministry of Digital Development – Anton Melnik and Minister Mikhail Fedorov. On behalf of the Meta, Ekaterina Kruk, Meta's Public Policy Manager for Central and Eastern Europe.

We started with the fact that I analyzed the largest texts of the American and European media, where the absolute lie about “Azov” poured. I have worked through these sources and made such a large reference document about what the regiment really is in order to disprove the basic myths from these propaganda materials. We sent this to the Ministry of Digital Development and our communication began with this, – says Yulia.

Representatives of the Mintsifra communicated and called up with the moderation department and Meta managers both in Europe and in the States. Minister Mikhail Fedorov raised the issue of the regiment's unit several times at meetings with Nick Clegg.

After that, the first concessions appeared on social networks regarding content about Azov. According to Anton Melnyk, they related to the military context – one could talk about the regiment and its fighters who participated in the battles and defended the country in the war. However, “Azov” could not have an official account, it was impossible to publish photos, write large posts or raise money to help the regiment.

So, work on unlocking the regiment was constantly going on in a kind of dialogue triangle: representatives of Azov – Mintsifra – Meta.

Hundreds of calls, meetings, ideas and brainstorms, what else can be done and how best to prove to Meta employees that “Azov” are not terrorists.

Yulia Fedosyuk says that the Association and the regiment had an understanding that there are 3 whales in the problem of the “Azov” bloc:

  • media,
  • Meta,
  • politicum.

“The media influence Meta, which takes into account the materials of reputable media. Unfortunately, the American politicians are also not transparent – they had their own agents of Moscow and people who were interested in certain scandals in order to develop their subjectivity. Therefore, in general, there is such a big tangle of problems and Meta is just one of the pebbles of the wall that we had to break through, and in fact it was a work that was not only about our own communications with them, but simply about working with arguments, with a huge amount of media that came out over 8 years, which, to Unfortunately, they didn't have an adequate answer,” Yulia explains.

The unblocking of Azov is certainly a historical decision that has no analogues. And yet – it can give an impetus to the world, in particular to countries saturated with Russian propaganda, to stop considering the regiment as Nazis. After all, Meta, like many other giant corporations, is listened to.

This is a very cool solution. We did not have examples when such a large-scale ban of everything was filmed, which lasted for several years. “Azov” will no longer scare people, it is no longer blocked on the Meta. This is a new story that is very brightly covered. And this once again means that Russian narratives are no more. And whoever had any doubts or hesitated, let this be such a final nail so that they accurately verify “Azov” in their head, – emphasizes Anton Melnik.

However, the struggle for the truth about Azov and the war in Ukraine continues. As long as the aggressor country only increases the speed of its propaganda machine in the world, we must smash it. And not only for Ukrainian society, but also for foreigners. The word is a weapon, and social networks are a tool to convey it.

Dissemination of information is the main thing. What the Ministry of Tsifra and the regiment started must be continued. This is not a static situation, it can change. And Russian propaganda has not gone away. We must continue so that this train only picks up speed, and Azov can no longer be compromised by the trifles with which it was done in 1414, “adds Yulia Fedosyuk.

Well, it is important that until now many defenders of “Azovstal” are still in Russian captivity. And we hope that unlocking messages about the regiment will speed up the process of their return home.

So the new story of “Azov” in social networks is just beginning …

Azov commander Denis Prokopenko with the soldiers of the regiment/Photo

Leave a Reply